OK I should have left out the beginning and end phrases, that's all.
Yes SP does have a lot of sniping, but all the information is on there.
Advice I will freely give, but I wouldn't have dreamt of advising a vendor without checking on here or sp first.
If Leslie had posted on her first, he would have found out what he needed to know and this problem wouldn't have existed.
If I acted as judge and Jury then so be it, but IMO, this kind of action can only give what we do a bad name.
For you info this is what you quote to stop a repo.
If you wish, type it into the court form, application to suspend N244, so the judge has it on the table before you and the vendor go in to see him.
Part A 2 should state. The possession warrant be suspended until the first available date after 42 days
because.
the possession warrant to the first available date after 42 days.
You may not get 42 but you should get at least 28
Now you may not like what I wrote, but at the moment this is an unregulated industry and I for one don't wish it getting a bad name.
Leslie may have acted in good faith, but anyone can be heard at court, assuming the judge allows it, and there would be no reason they wouldn't that I have come across.
DD is the key to how we make our property fortunes but also how we can help the vendor.
So IMO this wasn't sniping, this was stating simply not to jump into something as bad as a repossession without learning the facts first.
OK it's harsh it was meant to be this person got repossessed when it didn't have to happen. If you can't see that then I am lost for words.
I also don't see anywhere where it states I am an expert, but I have been doing this a while.